Under President Joe Biden, the U.S. government provided a letter signed by 51 intelligence professionals verifying the cover story, claiming that Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop was nothing more than a Russian plot against America and Russian disinformation.
All of it was false. The laptop was authentic, as were all of the startling images, texts, and videos on it.
With Donald Trump expected to become the nation’s next president in January, the deep state intelligence community in America is now terrified. Because of the type of false information that the Biden administration forced on the populace, the nation has completely lost faith and confidence in the three-letter alphabet agencies.
A combined interim staff report issued by multiple House committees has revealed new information on the role played by CIA contractors and the Biden campaign in sabotaging the Hunter Biden laptop story in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election.
High-ranking CIA officials, including then-Director Gina Haspel, allegedly knew about attempts to portray the Hunter Biden laptop tale as Russian misinformation, according to the investigation, The Intelligence Community 51: How CIA Contractors Colluded with The Biden Campaign to Mislead American Voters. 51 former intelligence officials swiftly rejected the October 2020 New York Post report about Hunter Biden’s alleged influence-peddling, stating in a statement that the story had the traditional hallmarks of a Russian information campaign.
The statement was created specifically to support Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, according to testimony included in the study. Michael Morell, a former Deputy CIA Director, testified that he drafted the statement after receiving a call from Antony Blinken, a prominent Biden campaign staffer who is currently the Secretary of State. The goal, Morell acknowledged, was to give Biden a political edge in the last presidential debate.
Key Findings from the Report
- CIA Awareness and Approval
Senior CIA officials were reportedly informed of the statement before its release. Testimony from Andrew Makridis, the CIA s Chief Operating Officer, indicated that either Director Haspel or Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop knew about the impending publication. Despite concerns raised by internal staff, the statement received tacit approval from leadership. - CIA Contractors Role
Several of the statement s signatories were on active contract with the CIA at the time, despite claims they were former officials without access to classified information. The report names Michael Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley as active contractors who played key roles in orchestrating the effort to discredit the Hunter Biden story. - Weaponization of Intelligence Titles
The report argues that the signatories leveraged their intelligence community credentials to lend credibility to the statement, further politicizing the intelligence apparatus. Internal CIA communications reportedly flagged the statement as politically motivated, warning that it could harm the Agency s reputation. - Departure from Protocols
The process by which the statement was reviewed and released bypassed standard Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) protocols. This deviation, the report claims, underscores the political nature of the effort.
A Politicized Intelligence Community?
Jim Jordan, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Mike Turner, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, denounced the coordination between intelligence personnel and the Biden campaign. Jordan stated that the dangers of an armed federal government are highlighted in this interim report.
Since April 2022, the committees have been looking into the statement’s origins; they resumed their investigation in early 2023 when Republicans took control of the House. Key participants’ testimonies, internal CIA emails, and classified materials served as the basis for the report.
Implications for 2024 and Beyond
The fresh disclosures coincide with heightened discussions about the politicization of intelligence services and Biden’s impending resignation as president. The Hunter Biden laptop incident, according to critics, is a prime example of how partisanship can coopt public institutions.
The results of the inquiry, which is still ongoing, raise important concerns about how politics, the media, and intelligence interact to influence public opinion during pivotal election times.
Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!
