It wasn’t a set.
Even though it’s being characterized as a collection of cardboard walls in a random D.C. home, the construction cost exceeded $100,000, and Alex Cooper isn’t holding back.
You can tell she’s telling the truth if you listen to the podcast again after hearing this. It was a hack.
Vice President Kamala Harris was accused of spending an astounding $100,000 on a makeshift studio set for an interview in Washington, D.C., by legendary broadcaster Alexandra Cooper in a recent interview with the host of Call Her Daddy. The vibrations were hardly six-figure fancy, to put it mildly.
The setup is as follows: Not even a decent studio was used for the interview. No, it took place in what Cooper’s visitor called a “random house” in Washington, D.C. According to her, the Harris campaign reportedly spent six figures to make the location look like Cooper’s upscale L.A. studio, which, incidentally, doesn’t even cost six figures.
Yes, you read correctly: Alex’s studio, which has an influencer aesthetic and is all marble glam, is LESS expensive than whatever these cardboard walls were meant to be.
Cooper joked, “With love to them, it wasn’t THAT nice.” Translation: The identical message would have been sent if you had simply placed some LED lights on a bookshelf.
What specifically did the campaign buy with all that cash? Personalized wallpaper? A microphone made of gold? For vibes, a spare pair of chairs? It’s still a mystery. One thing is certain, though: We didn’t anticipate this budgetary lesson.
Of course, the internet has ideas. While Call Her Daddy followers are laughing at how Cooper’s genuine studio looks upscale without needing VP-level funding, some are pointing out the cost.
We have inquiries. Was this an instance of over-efforting to impress? Did they simply misjudge how much it would cost to appear like a podcast star? Above all, how does a $100,000 set truly appear? Or was it just another instance of the Kamala campaign spending billions of dollars before the election to ensure that a back-end contractor who had a connection received a good wage for a rather subpar job?
Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!
