by A plea agreement to end the September 11, 2001 case with life sentences was reversed by a federal appeals court on Friday. This ruling may reopen the process for a drawn-out trial for the death penalty at Guantnamo Bay.The recent upheaval for families hoping for a conclusion in the protracted, excruciating case was the 2-to-1 ruling, which does not imply that the conspiracy trial can begin anytime soon. There may be more appeals. Additionally, the former military judge recently retired, so his successor will have to review the extensive evidence and make decisions on threshold issues, such as whether the confessions the prosecution want to utilize were obtained illegally through torture.
In the summer of 2024, a top Pentagon officer made the agreement with two other defendants and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who is alleged to have been the plot’s mastermind. To avoid a capital trial, each would confess to his part in the scheme.
Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III deemed the agreement null and unlawful within days of its completion. However, he was obligated to the agreement made by the senior Pentagon officer who oversaw the war court, a veteran Army attorney that Mr. Austin had nominated.
Patricia A. Millett and Neomi J. Rao, two justices on the U.S. Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, said on Friday that Mr. Austin unquestionably had the legal right to back out of the agreements.
Although prosecutors and defense attorneys brought the agreement before the court in the summer of 2024, the justices noted that no pledges had been fulfilled.
The content of the article is not being retrieved.
Please make sure that JavaScript is enabled in your browser.
We appreciate your patience as we check access. Please log out of Reader mode and sign in to your Times account, or subscribe to The Times in its entirety.
We appreciate your patience as we check access.
Are you a subscriber already?Sign in.
Do you want to read every Times article?Sign up.
