Chris Christie is frequently mentioned when Donald Trump considers candidates for the position of U.S. Attorney for New Jersey. Would this be a wise choice, though? Christie’s appointment may seem less like a wise political move and more like letting a fox into the henhouse given their complicated past.
Philip Sellinger, the incumbent U.S. Attorney, just announced his departure, creating the vacancy.
Let’s examine why Trump could want to reconsider his decision and who else would be a better candidate.
Why Christie Might Seem Like a Good Idea to his few and far between loyalists
The R amount is in Chris Christie’s possession. He established a reputation for taking tough measures against corruption while serving as the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey from 2002 to 2008. He gained well-known convictions by attacking politicians of both parties without hesitation. He demonstrated the forceful leadership style that some would contend is essential for the state’s top federal prosecutor while serving as governor.
Christie’s extensive knowledge of New Jersey’s political and judicial systems has drawbacks. This may theoretically make him a successful law enforcement officer. He understands the rules of the game and how to hold criminals accountable. But is that what Trump wants in someone who would be in charge of New Jersey federal cases? This leads us to this proposal’s problematic aspect.
Why Chris Christie would be a terrible choice
Let’s not mince words: the relationship between Donald Trump and Chris Christie is complex. Their bond, which was once political comrades, has drastically worsened. Christie has become one of Trump’s most outspoken Republican detractors, denouncing both his behavior and his policies. Given that Christie has demonstrated no reluctance to turn against his old colleagues, assigning him to such a significant position could ultimately backfire badly.
Even worse, the idea that Christie may use this position to target Trump directly is not wholly unrealistic. Christie would have considerable power as U.S. Attorney to look into federal offenses in New Jersey, including cases that might indirectly involve Trump or his associates. Given his recent comments about Trump and his willingness to publicly air grievances, one could argue Christie wouldn t hesitate to wield this power against his former friend. That is too big of a danger for someone as litigious as Trump to overlook.
Then there s Bridgegate, the infamous scandal during Christie s governorship where senior aides deliberately caused traffic chaos as political retribution. Though Christie denied involvement, the scandal damaged his reputation irreparably. Is it really affordable for Trump or New Jersey to give someone with that kind of baggage this much power?
If Trump wants loyalty and results without the personal drama, he might want to consider someone like Joseph Coronato, the former Ocean County Prosecutor. Coronato s focus on addressing the opioid crisis has earned him widespread respect in New Jersey. His innovative programs to combat overdoses and prioritize public health over punitive measures stand out as a model for smart law enforcement.
Unlike Christie, Coronato isn t mired in political feuds or high-profile controversies. He s seen as a steady hand and someone with a pragmatic, solutions-oriented approach. This makes him a much safer bet for Trump if the goal is to appoint someone who will do the job without the added risk of undermining the administration or creating new political headaches.
While Chris Christie s experience as U.S. Attorney and governor gives him a polished r sum , his long trail of controversies and his well-documented animosity toward Donald Trump make him an unwise choice. The risk of Christie using the position to settle scores, potentially even with Trump himself, looms large.
If loyalty and effectiveness are the priorities, Trump should look elsewhere perhaps to someone like Joseph Coronato rather than rekindle a partnership with Christie, a man who s proven time and again he s anything but predictable.
Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!
